UN denounces Israel cluster bombs

The UN's humanitarian chief has accused Israel of "completely immoral" use of cluster bombs in Lebanon.

UN clearance experts had so far found 100,000 unexploded cluster bomblets at 359 separate sites, Jan Egeland said.
Israel has repeated its previous insistence that munitions it uses in conflict comply with international law.
Earlier, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert rebuffed UN chief Kofi Annan's calls for a swift end to Israel's air and sea blockade of Lebanon.
After talks with Mr Annan, Mr Olmert said the siege would only be lifted once the ceasefire terms were fully implemented.

This included the release of two Israeli soldiers whose capture by Hezbollah militants sparked the conflict.
But a Lebanese Hezbollah cabinet minister said there would be no unconditional release of the soldiers - the pair would only be freed as a result of a prisoner exchange with Israel.


Every day, people are maimed, wounded and killed by these weapons - it shouldn't have happened
Jan EgelandUN humanitarian chief



UN efforts to rid Lebanon of cluster bombs have been under way since the conflict ended. Earlier estimates from UN experts had suggested a total of about 100 cluster bomb sites

Mr Egeland described the fresh statistics as "shocking new information".
"What's shocking and completely immoral is: 90% of the cluster bomb strikes occurred in the last 72 hours of the conflict, when we knew there would be a resolution," he said.

The UN ceasefire resolution which ended the month-long conflict between Israel and Hezbollah was agreed by the Security Council on Friday, 11 August, and came into effect on Monday, 14 August

Mr Egeland added: "Cluster bombs have affected large areas - lots of homes, lots of farmland. They will be with us for many months, possibly years.
"Every day, people are maimed, wounded and killed by these weapons. It shouldn't have happened."
Mr Egeland said his information had come from the UN Mine Action Co-ordination Centre, which had undertaken assessments of nearly 85% of the bombed areas in Lebanon.

Earlier this week the US state department launched an inquiry into whether Israel misused US-made cluster bombs in Lebanon during the conflict.

A senior White House official told the BBC that the investigation would focus on whether US-made weapons were used against non-military targets.

Blockade defended

At their talks in Jerusalem, Mr Annan and Mr Olmert discussed the deployment of UN troops in Lebanon as well as the continuing blockade.

The UN chief said he hoped Israel would withdraw from southern Lebanon once 5,000 UN peacekeepers were on the ground "in the coming days and weeks".

The BBC's Jill McGivering, in Jerusalem, said Mr Annan and Mr Olmert emerged from their meeting with little sign of the gap between them having narrowed

Mr Annan's Jerusalem talks followed a visit to Lebanon as part of a regional tour aimed at bolstering the truce between Israel and Hezbollah.

After his talks in Israel, Mr Annan flew to the West Bank for talks with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

At a joint press conference in Ramallah, Mr Annan said that more than 200 Palestinians had been killed since the end of June, and the violence had to stop.

Mr Annan has now arrived in Jordan for talks with King Abdullah II, after which he is expected to proceed to Syria.

Nasrallah regrets war in hindsight

Resistance leader says lebanese need not fear second round of fighting

Hizbullah's secretary general said Sunday that had the resistance known, "even 1 percent," that Israel would respond in the way that it did to the July 12 capture of two Israeli soldiers, the group would not have carried out the operation. In an interview with New Television, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said: "If I knew that the capture of the soldiers would have led to this result, had Hizbullah known even 1 percent, we definitely would have not carried it out."

Nasrallah added that the Lebanese need not fear a new round of fighting because Hizbullah would ignore "Israel's provocations."

"If we responded to these provocations, we would be in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 and this could open the debate on a second resolution, which [US President George W.] Bush wants and which is connected with disarming the resistance," he said.

Full article

Hizbullah, Israel agree to swap captives - report

By Nada Bakri
Daily Star

BEIRUT: Israel and Hizbullah have reached a deal brokered by Germany for a prisoner exchange to take place within two or three weeks, state-owned Egyptian daily Al-Ahram reported Sunday. "The prisoner swap deal between Hizbullah and Israel will take place within two or three weeks at the utmost, thanks to German mediation which is currently arranging the general framework for the deal between the two parties," the paper said quoting high ranking officials.

However, Hizbullah did not confirm the report.

BEIRUT: Israel and Hizbullah have reached a deal brokered by Germany for a prisoner exchange to take place within two or three weeks, state-owned Egyptian daily Al-Ahram reported Sunday. "The prisoner swap deal between Hizbullah and Israel will take place within two or three weeks at the utmost, thanks to German mediation which is currently arranging the general framework for the deal between the two parties," the paper said quoting high ranking officials.

However, Hizbullah did not confirm the report.

"We don't have any details besides what we hear from the Israeli side, which is that a retired German general is preparing a team to broker a deal," Hizbullah MP Mohammad Raad said.

He added that Hizbullah "does not have any additional information on the deal. We are watching things closely."

Al-Ahram said the swap might happen simultaneously or in two stages.
In the second scenario, Hizbullah will hand over the two soldiers it captured on July 12 and would receive "100 percent guarantees from the German mediator" that Israel would release Lebanese prisoners on the second or third day.

Hizbullah dubbed the raid Operation True Promise, saying it was making good on an earlier pledge to continue to capture Israeli soldiers and use them to obtain the release of the remaining Lebanese in Israeli jails.

The most recent swap - also brokered by Germany - took place in January 2004 when Israel handed over more than 400 Lebanese and Palestinian detainees in return for one Israeli reservist colonel and the bodies of three soldiers abducted along the Lebanon border in 2000.

That exchange left just three Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails: Samir Qantar, Nassim Nisr and a third, Yehya Skaff - whom Israel denies is being held. Qantar has been in prison for 28 years.

Hizbullah politburo member Ahmad Malli said the prisoner exchange deal will be similar to that of 2004.

"A prisoner swap will take place regardless of Israel's demand to release the soldiers without negotiations," he said.

"We did not emerge from this war the weak party to submit to Israel's demands and nothing will stop us from swapping these two soldiers with our prisoners in the Israeli jails," he added.

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni has said her government is ready to negotiate for a release of the two soldiers.

Al-Ahram said an exchange between Israel and Hizbullah would help secure the release of a third Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, captured June 25 in Gaza.

"Once a Hizbullah-Israel deal is reached, the Shalit problem could be solved" even before the other two soldiers are freed, the newspaper said.

Shalit's captors have demanded the release of hundreds of Palestinians detained by Israel, including women and minors.

The Jewish state has officially refused a swap and launched a punishing offensive against the Gaza Strip but mediation efforts led by Egypt are still believed to be under way.

Graphic showing UN troops deployments

European nations pledged up to 7,000 troops Friday to form the core of a beefed-up peacekeeping mission in Lebanon capable of enforcing the fragile truce between Israel and Hezbollah, officials said.(AFP/File)

An open letter to the American president

By Salim El Hoss, former prime minister of Lebanon

Dear Mr. Bush,

We heard you express your regrets regarding the casualties of "Israel's" ravaging war against my country, Lebanon.

I hope you have been furnished with a true profile of the atrocities being perpetrated in my country. You pose as being at war with terrorism.

Let me honestly tell you: Charity starts at home.""Israel"" is wantonly indulging in the most horrendous forms of terrorism in Lebanon: indiscriminately killing innocent civilians at random; not sparing children, elderly or handicapped people; demolishing buildings over their residents' heads; and destroying all infrastructure, roads, bridges, water and power arteries, harbors, air strips and storage facilities.

Nothing moving on the highways is spared, not even ambulances, trucks, trailers, cars or even motorcycles, all in violation of the Geneva Conventions and human rights.

The displaced population has reached more than one fourth of the total population of my country - all suffering the harshest and most miserable of conditions.

The victims include thousands of killed and maimed.If this is not terrorism, what is?"Israel's" savage assault has been labeled retribution for Hizbullah's abduction of two Israeli soldiers.

This smacks of collective punishment, which constitutes a brazen violation of the Geneva Conventions and human rights. Furthermore, the alibi is far from plausible.

The two Israeli soldiers were abducted for the express purpose of reaching a swap of hostages with "Israel". In fact, "Israel" had acceded more than once to such swaps in the past.

Why would a swap of prisoners be acceptable at one time and a taboo, rather a casus belli, at another? This created a conviction among the Lebanese that the sweeping assault against them was premeditated, and the abduction was only a tenuous excuse."Israel" is indulging in terrorism at its worst, at its ugliest, using the most lethal and sophisticated weapons you have supplied them.

We the Lebanese are justified in seeing in "Israel" as a most atrocious terrorist power, and seeing in you a direct partner. Mr. President: You are indeed a terrorist practicing the worst variant of terrorism as you condone the annihilation of my country, precluding a cease-fire to be announced, supporting the aggression against my people politically and diplomatically and bolstering "Israel's" destructive arsenal with the most lethal weaponry.

Mr. President: You are not fooling anybody with your alleged war against terrorism.

In our perspective, you and "Israel" are the most unscrupulous terrorists on earth. If you want to fight terrorism, we suggest that you start with your administration and your hideous ally, "Israel".You repeatedly claim that "Israel" is acting in self-defense.

How preposterous! Self-defense on other people's occupied territory is tantamount to one thing: blatant aggression.You call Hizbullah a terrorist organization.

We call it a legitimate resistance movement. There would have been no military wing of Hizbullah if there had been no Lebanese territory under Israeli occupation, if there had been no Lebanese hostages languishing in Israeli jails, and if Lebanon had not been exposed to almost daily Israeli intrusions into its airspace and territorial waters, and to sporadic incursions into Lebanese land and bombardment of civilian targets.

You cannot eliminate a party by demolishing a whole country. This would have been achieved peacefully by "Israel" withdrawing from the land it occupies, releasing Lebanese prisoners, and desisting from further acts of aggression against Lebanon.

"Israel" is the most horrendous terrorist power. And you, Mr. President, are unmistakably a direct partner, and hence a straight terrorist.

Source:Daily Star, 3-8-2006. Date: 03/08/2006 Time 09:51

Amnesty: Israel broke int'l law in war

Amnesty: Israel broke int'l law in war
By The Associated Press

LONDON - In a report to be released Wednesday, Amnesty International accuses Israel of war crimes, saying it broke international law by deliberately destroying Lebanon's civilian infrastructure during its recent war with Hezbollah guerrillas.

The human rights group said initial evidence, including the pattern and scope of the Israeli attacks, high number of civilian casualties, widespread damage and statements by Israeli officials "indicate that such destruction was deliberate and part of a military strategy, rather than 'collateral damage.'"

Amnesty International, whose delegates monitored the fighting in both Israel and Lebanon, said Israel violated international laws banning direct attacks on civilians and barring indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks.


The group urged the United Nations to look into whether both combatants, Israel and Hezbollah, broke international law.

Amnesty International said it would address Hezbollah's attacks on Israel separately. A senior Israeli government official, in Jerusalem, said his country acted legally. "Israel conformed to every international law.

We had attorneys in every meeting, everything we did along the way we fully explored international law," said the official, who was not authorized to speak to the media on the matter and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Israel suffered international condemnation when it attacked targets in southern Lebanon hours after Hezbollah guerrillas operating there killed three Israeli soldiers and captured two in a cross-border raid July 12.

The Israel Defense Forces has said that between that raid and the August 14 UN-brokered cease-fire, it launched more than 7,000 air attacks on Lebanese targets and the navy conducted about 2,500 bombardments.

The UN's children's fund, UNICEF, estimates that some 1,183 people died, mostly civilians and about a third of them children, while the Lebanese Higher Relief Council says 4,054 people were injured and 970,000 displaced.

UN officials reported that around 15,000 civilian homes were destroyed. The Amnesty report cited "the widespread destruction of apartments, houses, electricity and water services, roads, bridges, factories and ports," which, taken with statements by Israeli officials, "suggests a policy of punishing both the Lebanese government and the civilian population in an effort to get them to turn against Hezbollah," it said.

It accused Israel of applying an overly broad interpretation of what constituted a military objective when it attacked power plants, bridges, main roads, seaports and Beirut's international airport, all of which are "presumed to be civilian."

Lebanon's pain grows by the hour as death toll hits 1,300

Robert Fisk
Published: 17 August 2006

They are digging them up by the hour, the swelling death toll of the Lebanon conflict. The American poet Carl Sandburg spoke of the dead in other wars and imagined that he was the grass under which they would be buried.

"Shovel them under and let me work," he said of the dead of Ypres and Verdun. But across Lebanon, they are systematically lifting the tons of rubble of old roofs and apartment blocks and finding families below, their arms wrapped around each other in the moment of death as their homes were beaten down upon them by the Israeli air force. By last night, they had found 61 more bodies, taking the Lebanese dead of the 33-day war to almost 1,300.

In Srifa, south of the Litani river, they found 26 bodies beneath ruins which I myself stood on just three days ago. At Ainata, there were eight more bodies of civilians. A corpse was discovered beneath a collapsed four-storey house north of Tyre and, near by, the remains of a 16-year old girl, along with three children and an adult. In Khiam in eastern Lebanon, besieged by the Israelis for more than a month, the elderly village "mukhtar" was found dead in the ruins of his home.

Not all the dead were civilians. At Kfar Shuba, dumper-truck drivers found the bodies of four Hizbollah members. At Roueiss, however, all 13 bodies found in the wreckage of eight 10-storey buildings were civilians. They included seven children and a pregnant woman. Ten more bodies were disentangled from the rubble of the southern suburbs of Beirut - where local people claimed they could still hear the screams of neighbours trapped far below the bomb-smashed apartment blocks. The Lebanese civil defence organisation - almost as brave as the Lebanese Red Cross in trying to save lives under fire - believe at least three families may be trapped in basements deep below the wreckage.

Ignoring the dangers of unexploded ordnance, several Lebanese Shia Muslims returned to their destroyed homes to retrieve personal belongings - including family snapshots and albums that contain the narrative of their lives - only to fall between gaps in the broken apartment blocks and plunge dozens of feet into the darkness beneath. Among the last to die only minutes before the UN ceasefire came into effect was a child who was found in her dead mother's arms in Beirut.

How many of these dead would have survived if George Bush and Tony Blair had demanded an immediate ceasefire weeks ago will never be known. But many would have had the chance of life had Western governments not regarded this dirty war as an "opportunity" to create a "new" Middle East by humbling Iran and Syria.

Hezbollah says it foiled IDF commando raid in eastern Lebanon

08:15 19/08/2006

BEIRUT - Hezbollah said its guerrillas clashed early Saturday with an Israeli commando force that landed near their stronghold of Baalbek deep inside Lebanon.Earlier Saturday, Israeli aircraft fired several rockets at a target in a Hezbollah stronghold in eastern Lebanon early on Saturday morning, a Lebanese security source said.An Israel Defense Forces spokesman said the report was untrue.

Lebanese security officials could not confirm the Hezbollah TV report of a drop of Israeli commandos by helicopter at a field Boudai west of Baalbek in eastern Lebanon or whether there were any airstrikes.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to release information to reporters, reported heavy Israeli overflights.

Hezbollah's Al-Manar TV said the Israeli unit landed before dawn and was driving into the village, when it was intercepted by guerrillas, who forced it to retreat under the cover of warplanes.Israeli warplanes crisscrossed the skies above Lebanon's eastern Bekaa Valley early Saturday, near the Hezbollah stronghold of Baalbek, security officials said.

Israeli warplanes have not attacked Lebanon since an Aug. 14 cease-fire halted 34-days of fighting between Hezbollah and Israeli forces.

Such an attack would be the first since a UN truce ended 34 days of fighting between Israeli forces and Hezbollah.The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to release information to reporters, could not confirm whether there were any airstrikes.Similar overflights were reported Friday night in the same area.

The war is not over yet..

Just a feeling..Not a report from a news agency or an article by a famous writer..

Just a feeling that Israel wont stop there ..They are up to something and I hope and wish I am wrong with my feelings but watching all the Lebanese refugees going back to their destroyed homes,I felt a knot in my stomach,I felt that there is something wrong going on..

maybe Israel is just refueling,rearranging ..They said they were not ready when they started the attack,are they getting ready now?

I don't want them to catch Hezbollah off guard ..The whole cease fire procedure is suspicious..



I hope my feelings are wrong ..I pray they are

Lebanon war cost Israel 5.7 billion dollars: report

The cost of the month-old war in Lebanon on Israel's economy is estimated at nearly 5.7 billion dollars, the top-selling Yediot Aharonot daily reported Tuesday.

The total cost represents 10 percent of the state budget or around half of the defence budget, the newspaper said.

Official estimates put the cost of the massive air, sea and land operation launched after the July 12 Hezbollah border attack at around 2.3 billion dollars.

The damage caused by the 3,970 rockets fired into northern Israel during the 33 days of conflict tops 1.3 billion dollars.

An estimated 12,000 homes were demolished or damaged and 750,000 trees burned.

The drop in national production is also estimated at 1.3 billion, the cost of aid transfers to the local authorities in northern Israel at around half a billion, and the damage to nature at 220 million dollars.

The newspaper warned that the impact of the war on Israel's economic growth -- which stood at six percent last year -- could eventually turn out to be higher and raise the total bill to almost seven billion dollars.

According to the newspaper, 1,600 cars, 600 businesses and 100 factories were also damaged by Hezbollah rockets.

End of report

*******
So what?

how about the estimated cost of the lives of lebanese people killed during this war?

homes can be rebuilt,bridges can be reconstructed,but can lives be restored ?

Desert of trapped corpses testifies to Israel's failure

Robert Fisk
published: 15 August 2006

They made a desert and called it peace. Srifa - or what was once the village of Srifa - is a place of pancaked homes, blasted walls, rubble, starving cats and trapped corpses.

But it is also a place of victory for the Hizbollah, whose fighters walked amid the destruction yesterday with the air of conquering heroes. So who is to blame for this desert? The Shia militia which provoked this war - or the Israeli air force and army which has laid waste to southern Lebanon and killed so many of its people?

There was no doubt what the village mukhtar thought. As three Hizbollah men - one wounded in the arm, the other carrying two ammunition clips and a two-way radio - passed us amid the piles of broken concrete, Hussein Kamel el-Din yelled to them: "Hallo, heroes!" Then he turned to me. "You know why they are angry? Because God didn't give them the opportunity of dying."

You have to be down here with the Hizbollah amid this terrifying destruction - way south of the Litani river, in the territory from which Israel once vowed to expel them - to realise the nature of the past month of war and of its enormous political significance to the Middle East.

Israel's mighty army has already retreated from the neighbouring village of Ghandoutiya after losing 40 men in just over 36 hours of fighting.

It has not even managed to penetrate the smashed town of Khiam where the Hizbollah were celebrating yesterday afternoon.

In Srifa, I stood with Hizbollah men looking at the empty roads to the south and could see all the way to Israel and the settlement of Mizgav Am on the other side of the frontier.

This is not the way the war was supposed to have ended for Israel

Keep Reading

Let the voice of moderation speak

By HRH Prince Hassan bin Talal
Haaretz – August 14, 2006

How much aggression in our region has been justified by the mantra that western interests are under threat? The battle cries claim that all is at stake and every strike is a final defence of freedom and stability. But the premise behind this thinking has become all too obvious. Arabs and Muslims of whatever race or hue are not to be trusted. They are not to be dealt with fairly and the ‘liberal values’ that protect the righteous of Israel or the US are not for our defence or our protection. It seems, even the moderates in Arab societies lack the fibre that would grant them equality under international law. We are all as one, barbarians at the gate to be cowed and bullied into silent submission.

But we should be thankful that Arab moderation fights on with stoicism. Moderation will continue to battle for the hearts of those millions for whom this war on terror is an offence to their existential realities.

Boaz Ganor, the prominent Israeli thinker, addressed the question of terrorism and demanded that there be ‘no prohibition without definition’. Terrorism must be defined objectively based upon accepted international laws and principles regarding what behavior is permitted in conventional wars between nations.

The roots of that Arab anger and disillusionment which allows legitimacy to be handed over to extremists cannot be ignored.

Terrorism is a tactic borne out of a perversion of lines of representation. If we do not allow the many to speak, then the violent few will scream to be heard. It may be difficult for most Israelis to admit, but the Shia of southern Lebanon became politicized and militarized only in response to repeated Israeli aggression.

The citizens of Israel and the other states in the Middle East must be honest about the effects of decades of abuse of people and of international law, unless you believe that we Arabs possess a unique terrorist gene which has ignited our responses in recent decades. If this is the case, then throw firewood on the blaze and let our region burn until you have killed or exiled every last Arab in your neighbourhood.

The founders of Israel and, indeed, the United States, fought what they perceived as an occupation. Last week, some Israelis commemorated the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946 as a landmark act in ending the British mandate but surely this must be defined as an act of terror.

A statement in the British House of Commons at the time described the attack, in which 92 people were murdered, as “one of the most dastardly and cowardly crimes in recorded history”.

The Lebanese have been damned to repeat this phrase to describe attacks on their country. But in our world, righteousness belongs to the victor. If this is the way of the new world order and international law no longer has a place then, by all means, the extremists on all sides must fight to the death. The question is what can usefully be won in such a scenario? The evils of pain, suffering and moral bankruptcy are all the spoils of our new-world fighters.

The traumatic effects of the collective punishment of civilian populations will be felt for generations to come. The Israeli Defence Forces who occupy have made terror a daily reality for the civilian populations of Palestine and Lebanon, populations who have lived and continue to live through illegal occupation.

For the other side of this global war on terror, violence is most often something to read about. The threat of terror is fetishised by media and politicians and provides a scant excuse for policies that make terror a daily reality in the lives of millions of people in the Middle East.

No one can ignore the pain and suffering of the Israeli people in recent weeks but the policies of disproportionate reprisal and abuse of humanitarian norms can only beget further violence.

Jordan is a country that fought two world wars on the side of the allies. We have suffered from the shockwaves of aggression on all sides and we have endured threats and terror right up to Zarqawi’s terrible attacks on Amman. So do not patronise us by dubbing us allies in the war on terror and then dismiss our words when we question your policies.

The politics you entertain in this region are the product of a false perception. Our regional perspective is being ignored and, all the while, empowered extremists are gaining greater control.

We must not be fooled into thinking that a new Middle East can be devised by political strategists and imposed from top down.

The promotion of participatory democracy has been curtailed by a fear of empowering moderate Arabs and moderate Islamists.

Regimes within the region and powers outside attempt to stifle the protests of dismayed populations, protests that should be aired through banners and the ballot box. But the moderates are now shouting also.

The evolution of freedoms cannot be controlled from above, nor blasted into alien forms that poorly represent the needs of those seeking freedom.

With the ever-increasing polarisation of hate we should be grateful that exasperation has not stifled the protest of moderates.

US involved in planning Israel's operations in Lebanon: report

NEW YORK, Aug 13, 2006 (AFP) -

The US government was closely involved in planning Israel's military operations against Lebanon's Hezbollah militia even before the July 12 kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers, The New Yorker magazine reported in its latest issue.

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh writes that President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were convinced that a successful Israeli bombing campaign against Hezbollah could ease Israel's security concerns and also serve as a prototype for a potential US preemptive attack to destroy Iran's nuclear installations.

Citing an unnamed Middle East expert with knowledge of the current thinking of the Israeli and US governments, Hersh said Israel had devised a plan for attacking Hezbollah -- and shared it with Bush administration officials -- well before the July 12 kidnappings.

"When they grabbed the soldiers in early July, that was then a pretext" for Israel's assault on Hezbollah, Hersh said Sunday on CNN television.

"We (the US) worked closely with them (Israel) months before, not necessarily ... knowing when it was going to happen, but when there was an incident they will take advantage of the incident, what I call a fortunate timing'," Hersh said.

"Nobody is suggesting that Israel wouldn't have done what it did without the Americans," he added.

Hezbollah responded to Israel's attacks by firing missiles into Israel to escalate the month-long conflict that killed some 1,200 people on both sides.

A UN-organized cessation of hostilities planned for Monday, it was hoped, could bring an end to the fighting. In the article Hersh suggests the White House had several reasons for supporting an Israeli bombing campaign in Lebanon.

If Washington wanted to pursue a military attack against Iran over its nuclear program, the United States had to get rid of the weapons Hezbollah could use in a potential retaliation against Israel, he writes.

Citing a US government consultant with close ties to Israel, Hersh also reports that before the Hezbollah kidnappings, several Israeli officials visited Washington "to get a green light" for a bombing operation following a Hezbollah provocation, and also "to find out how much the United States would bear".

"The Israelis told us it would be a cheap war with many benefits," the magazine quotes the consultant as saying. "Why oppose it? We'll be able to hunt down and bomb missiles, tunnels, and bunkers from the air. It would be a demo for Iran."

US government officials have denied the charges, but Hersh defended his piece Sunday saying he had strong sources for the article which was thoroughly vetted by New Yorker editors.

"This White House will find a way to view what happened with the Israelis against Hezbollah as a victory, and they'll find a way to see it as a positive for any planning that is going towards Iran," he told CNN.

In the magazine Hersh writes that a former senior intelligence official said some officers serving with the Joint Chiefs of Staff -- a council of the president's top military advisors -- remain concerned that the administration will have a far more positive assessment of the air campaign than they should.

"There is no way that (Defense Secretary Donald) Rumsfeld and Cheney will draw the right conclusion about this," Hersh quotes the former official as saying.

"When the smoke clears, they'll say it was a success, and they'll draw reinforcement for their plan to attack Iran."

lest we forget

Remember???

Can we ever trust them?

There is no military solution!

Gush Shalom (Translated from Hebrew, the name means "The Peace Bloc")is the hard core of the Israeli peace movement.

these ads were published in Haaretz
*************

So one general has been Replaced by another.
So we shall reach The Litani.
And then what?
Hizbullah Will continue to exist.
The rockets Will continue to fly.
The border Will not be quiet. There is only A political solution.
There is no Military solution.


The proposal of The Lebanese government To deploy 15 thousand soldiers vIs a ladder that allows us To get down from the tree.
Let's stop Endangering the Lives of our soldiers For no purpose.
Get the soldiers Out of this quagmire - N O W !

The war is Against Hizbullah.
The cease-fire Must also be With Hizbullah.
A settlement without Hizbullah and Syria Will not be Worth the paper It is written on.

This is not A resolution For a cease-fire.
This is a resolution For the continuation Of the war,
The killing, The devastation.
But what do The Americans And the French care?
It's nor their Own blood.

This war has Only one aim left:
To save the prestige of Olmert, Peretz And Halutz.
All the other aims Have gone up in smoke.
There is no military solution.

After the war, The situation will be As it was before.
A hundred speeches Of Olmert Will not change that.
There is no military solution.
Only a political settlement.

"We warned them And called on them To escape!"
That is disgusting Hypocrisy.
Because we have:
Bombed the roads.
Destroyed the bridges.
Cut off the supply of gasoline.
Killed whole families on the way.
There is only one way Of preventing more such disasters, Which turn us into monsters:
T O S T O P!
There is no military solution!


"Condoleezza gives us All the time we need To continue the war."
"Condoleezza will stop The war In a week."
Condoleezza and her boss Open and close The tap - According to their Own interests, Of course.
From this tap There flows Blood.

Now they all admit:
The government has started this war In light-hearted haste, Without checking alternatives, Without prior discussion.
Now we are stuck in the mud.
All the wise guys have an advice About how to get out of it:
Get into it even deeper.
To get out of this mud There is only one way:
To get an agreement and
G E T O U T!

While the eyes of the public Are riveted to the Daily bloodletting in Lebanon
The wholesale killing In the Gaza Strip Is going on.
Women and children Are also killed Every day.
This bill, too, Will be presented to us In the future.

What do you say to a man whose family is buried under the rubble

Robert Fisk
Published: 09 August 2006

There were bulldozers turning over the tons of rubble, a cloud of dust and smoke a mile high over the smashed slums of Beirut's southern suburbs and a tall man in a grey T-shirt - a Brooklyn taxi driver, no less - standing on the verge of tears, staring at what may well be the grave of his grandfather, his uncle and aunt.

Half the family home had been torn away and the entire block of civilian apartments next door had been smashed to the ground a few hours earlier by the two missiles that exploded in Asaad al-Assad Street

What do you say to a man whose family is buried under the rubble?

The last corpse had been a man whose face appeared etched in dust before the muck was removed and he turned out to be paper-thin - so perfectly had the falling concrete crushed him.

Mohamed al-Husseini had left New York for a holiday with his young wife and infant child - they were safe in the centre of Beirut - because he wanted to see his family home and talk to the relatives he grew up with

"Just look what the Israelis have done," he said, not taking his eyes off the floors of the apartments, now scarcely an inch between them.

"I am confused. You know? I don't know what to do. I could go back to my wife and kid but the rest of my family is in there. They used to live in the south and they survived there. Then they come to Beirut and die here."

keep reading

I fear for Lebanon

Almost a month now since the brutal attack on Lebanon started, the UN is STILL considering a ceasefire,the headlines of middle east crisis are still about Lebanon(I wonder who's next),the Lebanese nation is still scattered ,many are homeless,many are buried in mass graves..

I fear for Lebanon

I fear the day the world will look at the Lebanese crisis as they look at the Palestinian one,I fear that the day will come when the world loses interest in solving the matter and when the UN comes up with more defied resolutions.

I fear for Lebanon

what I fear most is that the attack on Lebanon turns into something common ,that the death of children there will be expected..Same as in the Palestinian intifada..I fear the day will come when we all lose interest,when we stop checking the news,when we leave the whole issue into the hands of those who care less

I fear that the deaths there will be a new statistic
the homeless settle outside their land
and the ones who left start a new life outside their homeland

This draft shows who is running America's policy... Israel

By:Robert Fisk

So the great and the good on the East River laboured at the United Nations Security Council - and brought forth a lemon. You could almost hear the Lebanese groan at this draft resolution, a document of such bias and mendacity that a close Lebanese friend read carefully through it yesterday, cursed and uttered the immortal question: "Don't these bastards learn anything from history?"

And there it all was again, the warmed-up peace proposals of Israel's 1982 invasion, full of buffer zones and disarmament and "strict respect by all parties" - a rousing chortle here, no doubt, from Hizbollah members - and the need for Lebanese sovereignty. It didn't even demand the withdrawal of Israeli forces, a point that Walid Moallem, Syria's Foreign Minister - and the man the Americans will eventually have to negotiate with - seized upon with more than alacrity. It was a dead UN resolution without a total Israeli retreat, he said on a strategic trip to Beirut.


A close analysis of the American-French draft - the fingerprints of John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, were almost smudging the paragraphs - showed just who is running Washington's Middle East policy: Israel

Full Article

Countless UN Resolutions on Israel

Israel is in defiance of 69 UN Security Council resolutions.

A brief explanation of some important resolutions.


Palestinian Refugees have the right to return to their homes in Israel.
General Assembly Resolution 194, Dec. 11, 1948

"Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible."

Israel's occupation of Palestine is Illegal.
Security Council Resolution 242, Nov. 22, 1967

Calls for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from territories occupied in the war that year and "the acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."

Israel's settlements in Palestine are Illegal.
Security Council Resolution 446, March 22, 1979

"Determines that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East."


Palestinian have the right to Self-Determination.
General Assembly Resolution 3236, November 22, 1974

Affirms "the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine...to self-determination without external interference" and "to national independence and sovereignty."

Reaffirmation of a Palestinian State
Security Council Resolution 1397, March 12, 2002

Affirms "a vision of a region where two states, Israel and Palestine, live side by side within secure and recognized borders."


UN General Assembly Resolution 181 - the 1947 Partition plan of Palestine and the creation of Israel.

International Humanitarian Law: the Geneva Conventions - 150 years of international designated protection of civilians during wartime and Israel's explicit violations.

History of the Palestinian Problem - from the Division for Palestinian Rights, United Nations

Countless More UN Resolutions on Israel - 1955-1992

Resolution 106: condemns Israel for Gaza raid.

Resolution 111: condemns Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people
.
Resolution 127: recommends Israel suspend its no-man's zone' in Jerusalem.

Resolution 162: urges Israel to comply with UN decisions.

Resolution 171: determines flagrant violations by Israel in its attack on Syria.

Resolution 228: censures Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control.

Resolution 237: urges Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees.

Resolution 248: condemns Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan.

Resolution 250: calls on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem.

Resolution 251: deeply deplores Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250.

Resolution 252: declares invalid Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital.

Resolution 256: condemns Israeli raids on Jordan as flagrant violation.

Resolution 259: deplores Israel's refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation.

Resolution 262: condemns Israel for attack on Beirut airport.

Resolution 265: condemns Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan.

Resolution 267: censures Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem.

Resolution 270: condemns Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon.

Resolution 271: condemns Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem.

Resolution 279: demands withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon.

Resolution 280: condemns Israeli's attacks against Lebanon.

Resolution 285: demands immediate Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon.

Resolution 298: deplores Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem.

Resolution 313: demands that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon.

Resolution 316: condemns Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon.

Resolution 317: deplores Israel's refusal to release.

Resolution 332: condemns Israel's repeated attacks against Lebanon.

Resolution 337: condemns Israel for violating Lebanon's sovereignty.

Resolution 347: condemns Israeli attacks on Lebanon.

Resolution 425: calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon.

Resolution 427: calls on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon
.
Resolution 444: deplores Israel's lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces.

Resolution 446: determines that Israeli settlements are a serious obstruction to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention

Resolution 450: calls on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon.

Resolution 452: calls on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories.

Resolution 465: deplores Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to assist its settlements program.

Resolution 467: strongly deplores Israel's military intervention in Lebanon.

Resolution 468: calls on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return.

Resolution 469: strongly deplores Israel's failure to observe the council's order not to deport Palestinians.

Resolution 471: expresses deep concern at Israel's failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Resolution 476: reiterates that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are null and void.

Resolution 478: censures (Israel) in the strongest terms for its claim to Jerusalem in its Basic Law.

Resolution 484: declares it imperative that Israel re-admit two deported Palestinian mayors.

Resolution 487: strongly condemns Israel for its attack on Iraq's nuclear facility.

Resolution 497: decides that Israel's annexation of Syria's Golan Heights
is null and void and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith.

Resolution 498: calls on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon.

Resolution 501: calls on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops.

Resolution 509: demands that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon.

Resolution 515: demands that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in.

Resolution 517: censures Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon.

Resolution 518: demands that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon.
Resolution 520: condemns Israel's attack into West Beirut.

Resolution 573: condemns Israel vigorously for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters.

Resolution 587: takes note of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw.

Resolution 592: strongly deplores the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops.

Resolution 605: strongly deplores Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.

Resolution 607: calls on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Resolution 608: deeply regrets that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians.

Resolution 636: deeply regrets Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.

Resolution 641: deplores Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.

Resolution 672: condemns Israel for violence against Palestinians at the Haram Al-Sharif/Temple Mount.

Resolution 673: deplores Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.

Resolution 681: deplores Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.

Resolution 694: deplores Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.

Resolution 726: strongly condemns Israel's deportation of Palestinians.

Resolution 799: strongly condemns Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return.


So how many of these were implemented?mmm...aha ..

none..

so much for the UN and its resolutions..

The End of Lebanon?????

by:Ran HaCohen

The UN Security Council resolution draft on Lebanon reflects a new stage of Western colonialism in the Middle East, and perhaps a historic precedent:

for the first time, the UN Security Council – should the resolution draft be endorsed – breaches the fundamental principle of the right of people under occupation to resist, and in fact legitimizes the violent partition of the sovereign state of Lebanon.


The American-French draft reflects the interests of three central colonial powers in the region: the U.S., the main colonial power in Iraq and Afghanistan; its client and proxy Israel, which is occupying the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and Gaza as well as part of Syria, and occupied south Lebanon for 22 years (1978-2000); and France, the former colonial empire in Lebanon after WWI.

No wonder that the draft, which pays lip-service to Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity, in fact suggests a partition of this small land.

Challenged Sovereignty

Lebanon's sovereignty has always been challenged. France and Great Britain did not end their colonialism until after WWII.
Syria considered Lebanon one of its provinces.
Israel's first leader, David Ben-Gurion, believed the natural border of the Jewish state should be Lebanon's Litani River, and this legacy has apparently guided the Israeli army ever since.

Up to the last half decade, Lebanon was in fact partitioned into two power spheres: the Israeli-occupied south, and the Syrian-occupied rest of the country. Both countries used each other's occupation of Lebanon as an excuse not to end their own.

Finally, Israel withdrew from Lebanon in 2000, but it has not respected Lebanon's sovereignty for a single day since. As every UN report for the years 2000-2006 stresses, Israeli jets have violated Lebanese air space by daily overflights, sowing anxiety by sonic booms over populated areas.

At the same time, pressure grew on Syria to end its occupation
At last, the international – mainly Western – community made president Assad Jr. withdraw the Syrian forces from Lebanon in 2005.

These developments, which looked like the rehabilitation of Lebanon's sovereignty, now seem to lead to the very opposite: a renewed Israeli occupation of south Lebanon, supported by the U.S. and France and backed by a UN Security Council resolution

keep reading

The draft UN resolution

This is the draft concluded between the US, France and Britain on resolving the Lebanon crisis which has yet to be agreed by the Security Council


PP1.

Recalling all its previous resolutions on Lebanon, in particular resolutions 425 (1978), 426 (1978), 520 (1982), 1559 (2004), 1655 (2006) and 1680 (2006), as well as the statements of its President on the situation in Lebanon, in particular the statements of 18 June 2000 (S/PRST/2000/21), of 19 October 2004 (S/PRST/2004/36), of 4 May 2005 (S/PRST/2005/17) of 23 January 2006 (S/PRST/2006/3) and of 30 July 2006 (S/PRST/2006/35),

PP2.

Expressing its utmost concern at the continuing escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and in Israel since Hizbollah's attack on Israel on 12 July 2006, which has already caused hundreds of deaths and injuries on both sides, extensive damage to civilian infrastructure and hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons

PP3.

Emphasizing the need for an end of violence, but at the same time emphasizing the need to address urgently the causes that have given rise to the current crisis, including by the unconditional release of the abducted Israeli soldiers

PP4:

Mindful of the sensitivity of the issue of prisoners and encouraging the efforts aimed at settling the issue of the Lebanese prisoners detained in Israel

OP1.

Calls for a full cessation of hostilities based upon, in particular, the immediate cessation by Hizbollah of all attacks and the immediate cessation by Israel of all offensive military operations

OP2.

Reiterates its strong support for full respect for the Blue Line

OP3.

Also reiterates its strong support for the territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence of Lebanon within its internationally recognized borders, as contemplated by the Israeli-Lebanese General Armistice Agreement of 23 March 1949;

OP4.

Calls on the international community to take immediate steps to extend its financial and humanitarian assistance to the Lebanese people, including through facilitating the safe return of displaced persons and, under the authority of the Government of Lebanon, reopening airports and harbours for verifiably and purely civilian purposes, and calls on it also to consider further assistance in the future to contribute to the reconstruction and development of Lebanon;

OP5.

Emphasizes the importance of the extension of the control of the Government of Lebanon over all Lebanese territory in accordance with the provisions of resolution 1559 (2004) and resolution 1680 (2006), and of the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords, for it to exercise its full sovereignty and authority;

OP6.

Calls for Israel and Lebanon to support a permanent ceasefire and a long-term solution based on the following principles and elements:

· strict respect by all parties for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Israel and Lebanon;

· full respect for the Blue Line by both parties;

· delineation of the international borders of Lebanon, especially in those areas where the border is disputed or uncertain, including in the Shebaa farms area;

· security arrangements to prevent the resumption of hostilities, including the establishment between the Blue Line and the Litani river of an area free of any armed personnel, assets and weapons other than those of the Lebanese armed and security forces and of UN mandated international forces deployed in this area;

· full implementation of the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords and of resolutions 1559 (2004) and 1680 (2006) that require the disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon, so that, pursuant to the Lebanese cabinet decision of July 27, 2006, there will be no weapons or authority in Lebanon other than that of the Lebanese state;

· deployment of an international force in Lebanon, consistent with paragraph 10 below;


· establishment of an international embargo on the sale or supply of arms and related material to Lebanon except as authorized by its government;

· elimination of foreign forces in Lebanon without the consent of its government;

· provision to the United Nations of remaining maps of land mines in Lebanon in Israel's possession;

OP7.

Invites the Secretary General to support efforts to secure agreements in principle from the Government of Lebanon and the Government of Israel to the principles and elements for a long-term solution as set forth in paragraph 6 above;

OP8.

Requests the Secretary General to develop, in liaison with key international actors and the concerned parties, proposals to implement the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords, and of resolutions 1559 (2004) and 1680 (2006), including disarmament, and for delineation of the international borders of Lebanon, especially in those areas where the border is disputed or uncertain, including by dealing with the Shebaa farms, and to present those proposals to the Security Council within thirty days;

OP9.

Calls on all parties to cooperate during this period with the Security Council and to refrain from any action contrary to paragraph 1 above that might adversely affect the search for a long-term solution, humanitarian access to civilian populations, or the safe return of displaced persons, and requests the Secretary General to keep the Council informed in this regard;

OP10. Expresses its intention, upon confirmation to the Security Council that the Government of Lebanon and the Government of Israel have agreed in principle to the principles and elements for a long-term solution as set forth in paragraph 6 above, and subject to their approval, to authorize in a further resolution under Chapter VII of the Charter the deployment of a UN mandated international force to support the Lebanese armed forces and government in providing a secure environment and contribute to the implementation of a permanent ceasefire and a long-term solution;

OP11.

Requests UNIFIL, upon cessation of hostilities, to monitor its implementation and to extend its assistance to help ensure humanitarian access to civilian populations and the safe return of displaced persons;


OP12.

Calls upon the Government of Lebanon to ensure arms or related materiel are not imported into Lebanon without its consent and requests UNIFIL, conditions permitting, to assist the Government of Lebanon at its request;

OP13.

Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Council within one week on the implementation of this resolution and to provide any relevant information in light of the Council's intention to adopt, consistent with paragraph 10 above, a further resolution;

OP14.

Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.

source:Guardian Unlimited

Galloway"the UN resolution means nothing"

'George Galloway has spoken out in support of Lebanon, saying he believes Hizbollah is justified in attacking Israel. The Respect MP also lambasted media coverage of the war and said the UN resolution means nothing.





Sky news

masa7 feeha il ard..yes3do :D

100,000 demonstrate in London

The Stop the War emergency demonstration on Saturday 5 August brought over 100,000 protestors onto London's streets. This is unprecedented for a protest called with only one week's notice, such is the nationwide anger at Israel's barbaric destruction of Lebanon and Gaza. Protestors came from every corner of Britain to demand an unconditional ceasefire in Lebanonand Gaza NOW

British police officers stand guard outside of Downing Street as people throw children's shoes towards the gates in protest of the deaths of children, during a demonstration calling for an immediate ceasefire in Lebanon on August 5, 2006 in London, England.

Children's shoes are left at the Cenotaph war monument in protest of the deaths of children

Save the Lebanese Civilians Petition

Did you sign the petition?

if not please DO

http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php

The Independent Appeal: Help save Lebanon's children

Of the 615 people so far confirmed dead in Lebanon, Save The Children says that almost half are children.

They make up one third of the 3,225 injured, and about 45 per cent of the nearly one million Lebanese refugees are under the age of 18, according to Unicef.

But despite the shocking images and the harrowing accounts of suffering, there is an acute shortfall of money raised for the children caught up in the conflict.

They need help now.

The Independent and Save the Children are launching an appeal for the children of Lebanon, for urgent food, medicine and clothing desperately needed as the violence continues to escalate.

Save the Children stresses that just £1 will buy candles and matches for a family; £10 will help provide adequate hygiene for a child and £50 will pay for food for a family in the short term. But international agencies say the public response has been surprisingly slow to appeals for funds.

Donate now by visiting www.savethechildren.org.uk/independent

or call our free emergency donation line 0800 8148 148



Donate now

Unconditional Ceasefire Now

DEMONSTRATE

Join the national demonstration

Saturday 5 August

Assemble 12 Noon

Speakers Corner, Hyde Park, London

March to Parliament Square for rally

The World says :stop.

Bush and Blair back Israel's barbarism without limit. 1000 dead.

A million flee their homes. How many more Qana massacres?

Sign the Tony Blair letter

Leave children's shoes on Tony Blair's doorstep

Almost half of those killed so far in Lebanon are children.

Bring children's shoes to the national demonstration on Saturday 5 August.

We will leave them at The Cenotauph, on Tony Blair's doorstep, to express our horror at his complicity in war crimes which have lead to the slaughter of so many children in Lebanon, Gaza, Iraq and Afghanistan

End this barbarism now

No more crocodile tears please

by:Hasan Abu Nimah
Jordan Times

We woke up Sunday to one more day of Israel’s war on the civilian population of this region. It is the same war, the latest phase of which is against Lebanon, the same war that the “international community” has been handling with exceptional skill for more than half a century.

All those Western liberals who now express “shock” over Israel’s “disproportionate” or “excessive” use of force should be less naive, or perhaps more honest. What are they shocked about exactly? Was the butchery of dozens of children in Qana the first massacre committed by Israel? Do they imagine it will be the last?

Do they need to be reminded that the history of Israel is one long series of massacres, ever since the Zionist movement came to Palestine with the intent to remove its indigenous population and found a racist state in their place.

Just to refresh the memory, “terrorism” was introduced to our region decades before Hizbollah and Hamas were founded, by that same Zionist movement. They first used the tactic of bombing marketplaces,government buildings, restaurants, railway stations and hotels — in their war to “liberate” Palestine from its native people.

They spared no means, no matter how cruel, in their campaign to force the British imperial authorities to leave so that a “Jewish state” could be established.

The same Zionist terrorists whose pictures were posted all over the place as “wanted” criminals who bombed and murdered UN officials, British officers and soldiers as well as Arab and Jewish civilians, later put on ties and were called “man of peace” and “prime minister of Israel.”

In the months preceding and following the British departure, the Zionist plan necessitated committing massacres on a massive scale. In 2004 the Israeli historian Benny Morris said: A “Jewish state would not have come into being without the uprooting of 700,000 Palestinians. Therefore it was necessary to uproot them.” “There are circumstances in history that justify ethnic cleansing,” he added. Who can now possibly express genuine surprise that in a matter of two weeks Israel has expelled 700,000 Lebanese from their homes under the threat of death?

There is also nothing new about Israel’s full-scale assault on Lebanon’s civilian infrastructure.

For decades after the expulsion of the Palestinians, refugee camps and infrastructure were constantly bombed in Lebanon and Jordan. Has any Israeli yet stood trial for the massacres of defenceless Palestinian refugees at the Sabra and Shatilla camps in 1982 by Israeli-armed and trained Lebanese militias under the overall authority of Ariel Sharon, or has the world forgotten the deeds carried out by that “statesman”?

Is there really any difference between those deeds and the full-scale assault refugees in Gaza have been subjected to — bombed and murdered from the air 24 hours a day since Israel’s fraudulent “withdrawal”?

Continue Reading

AUB Medical Center needs help.... Time's Running Out

Lebanese and non-lebanese.

you can help

Forward this in your emails or post it in blogs




There is not much time left before the lights will go out at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Oil tankers ready to deliver the much-needed fuel are standing by in nearby waters, but they are being kept out by the Israel's blockade.


The hospital has only enough oil to fuel their generators for a maximum of 20 days, or as little as seven days if the state cuts off the little power it now provides, according to Dr. Nadim Cortas, Dean of the medical program.


Israel and others may fear the fuel those tankers carry would go to Hezbollah fighters, used for their trucks and artillery. But Cortas argues this point.

Continue reading

'How can we stand by and allow this to go on?'

By Robert Fisk'
Published: 31 July 2006

They wrote the names of the dead children on their plastic shrouds. " Mehdi Hashem, aged seven ­ Qana," was written in felt pen on the bag in which the little boy's body lay. "Hussein al-Mohamed, aged 12 ­ Qana", "Abbas al-Shalhoub, aged one ­ Qana.'' And when the Lebanese soldier went to pick up Abbas's little body, it bounced on his shoulder as the boy might have done on his father's shoulder on Saturday. In all, there were 56 corpses brought to the Tyre government hospital and other surgeries, and 34 of them were children. When they ran out of plastic bags, they wrapped the small corpses in carpets. Their hair was matted with dust, most had blood running from their noses.


You must have a heart of stone not to feel the outrage that those of us watching this experienced yesterday. This slaughter was an obscenity, an atrocity ­ yes, if the Israeli air force truly bombs with the " pinpoint accuracy'' it claims, this was also a war crime. Israel claimed that missiles had been fired by Hizbollah gunmen from the south Lebanese town of Qana ­ as if that justified this massacre. Israel's Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, talked about "Muslim terror" threatening " western civilisation" ­ as if the Hizbollah had killed all these poor people.


And in Qana, of all places. For only 10 years ago, this was the scene of another Israeli massacre, the slaughter of 106 Lebanese refugees by an Israeli artillery battery as they sheltered in a UN base in the town. More than half of those 106 were children. Israel later said it had no live-time pilotless photo-reconnaissance aircraft over the scene of that killing ­ a statement that turned out to be untrue when The Independent discovered videotape showing just such an aircraft over the burning camp. It is as if Qana ­ whose inhabitants claim that this was the village in which Jesus turned water into wine ­ has been damned by the world, doomed forever to receive tragedy.

And there was no doubt of the missile which killed all those children yesterday. It came from the United States, and upon a fragment of it was written: "For use on MK-84 Guided Bomb BSU-37-B". No doubt the manufacturers can call it "combat-proven" because it destroyed the entire three-storey house in which the Shalhoub and Hashim families lived. They had taken refuge in the basement from an enormous Israeli bombardment, and that is where most of them died.


I found Nejwah Shalhoub lying in the government hospital in Tyre, her jaw and face bandaged like Robespierre's before his execution. She did not weep, nor did she scream, although the pain was written on her face. Her brother Taisir, who was 46, had been killed. So had her sister Najla. So had her little niece Zeinab, who was just six. "We were in the basement hiding when the bomb exploded at one o'clock in the morning,'' she said. "What in the name of God have we done to deserve this? So many of the dead are children, the old, women. Some of the children were still awake and playing. Why does the world do this to us?"


Yesterday's deaths brought to more than 500 the total civilian dead in Lebanon since Israel's air, sea and land bombardment of the country began on 12 July after Hizbollah members crossed the frontier wire, killed three Israeli soldiers and captured two others. But yesterday's slaughter ended more than a year of mutual antagonism within the Lebanese government as pro-American and pro-Syrian politicians denounced what they described as " an ugly crime".


Thousands of protesters attacked the largest United Nations building in Beirut, screaming: "Destroy Tel Aviv, destroy Tel Aviv," and Lebanon's Prime Minister, the normally unflappable Fouad Siniora, called US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and ordered her to cancel her imminent peace-making trip to Beirut.


No one in this country can forget how President George Bush, Ms Rice, and Tony Blair have repeatedly refused to call for an immediate ceasefire ­ a truce that would have saved all those lives yesterday. Ms Rice would say only: "We want a ceasefire as soon as possible,'' a remark followed by an Israeli announcement that it intended to maintain its bombardment of Lebanon for at least another two weeks.


Throughout the day, Qana villagers and civil defence workers dug through the ruins of the building with spades and with their hands, tearing at the muck until they found one body after another still dressed in colourful clothes. In one section of the rubble, they found what was left of a single room with 18 bodies inside. Twelve of the dead were women. All across southern Lebanon now, you find scenes like this, not so grotesque in scale, perhaps, but just as terrible, for the people of these villages are terrified to leave and terrified to stay. The Israelis had dropped leaflets over Qana, ordering its people to leave their homes. Yet twice now since Israel's onslaught began, the Israelis have ordered villagers to leave their houses and then attacked them with aircraft as they obeyed the Israeli instructions and fled.

There are at least 3,000 Shia Muslims trapped in villages between Qlaya and Aiteroun ­ close to the scene of Israel's last military incursion at Bint Jbeil ­ and yet none of them can leave without fear of dying on the roads.


And Mr Olmert's reaction? After expressing his "great sorrow", he announced that: "We will not stop this battle, despite the difficult incidents [sic] this morning. We will continue the activity, and if necessary it will be broadened without hesitation." But how much further can it be broadened?

Lebanon's infrastructure is being steadily torn to pieces, its villages razed, its people more and more terrorised ­ and terror is the word they used ­ by Israel's American-made fighter bombers. Hizbollah's missiles are Iranian-made, and it was Hizbollah that started this war with its illegal and provocative raid across the border. But Israel's savagery against the civilian population has deeply shocked not only the Western diplomats who have remained in Beirut, but hundreds of humanitarian workers from the Red Cross and major aid agencies.


Read the whole article